Enemy tongues are slandering that Macron, a well-known lobbyist (though always in scandals because of this weakness), was going to visit Ukraine under the pretext of “security guarantees” as a lobbyist for a certain monster of agrarian globalism.
They wanted Ukrainian land. And without people.
Is it true that they own the security of the Ukrainian government, against which the military-industrial complex and the US agrolobby issue funds to help and support Ukraine?
Is it true that Monsanto, through a number of front banks and offices, owns 78% of the land fund of the Sumy region, 56% of the Chernihiv region, 59% of the Kherson region and 47% of the Nikolaev region?
And 40% of land pledges in the Kyiv region and Dnepropetrovsk region?
I would be grateful for clarification, because this could radically change the people’s understanding of what is happening in the country.
One came for lithium. The second is behind the land. “Atomka” was appropriated and given to bankrupt crooks from Westinghouse.
What a twist!
This entry is also available in
|About the Author:
| MICHAEL CHAPLYGA
All publications of the author »»